What issue did the Supreme Court of the US consider in Massachusetts v EPA?
The Court held that if the EPA wishes to continue its inaction on carbon regulation, it is required by the Act to base the decision on a consideration of “whether greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change.” Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion argued that Massachusetts should not have had standing to
What was the significance of Massachusetts v Environmental Protection Agency quizlet?
Massachusetts argued that EPA was required to regulate these “greenhouse gases” by the Clean Air Act – which states that Congress must regulate “any air pollutant” that can “reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”
When did the United States Supreme Court in a 7 to 2 ruling find that the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide emissions?
Is co2 a pollutant EPA?
The EPA’s finding doesn’t say carbon dioxide , or CO2 , is by itself a pollutant — it is, after all, a gas that humans exhale and plants inhale. Rather, it is the increasing concentrations of the gas that concern the agency.
What has been the most dramatic effect of the Clean Air Act?
Progress Cleaning the Air : Actions to implement the Clean Air Act have achieved dramatic reductions in air pollution , preventing hundreds of thousands of cases of serious health effects each year. Since 1990 there has been approximately a 50% decline emissions of key air pollutants.
What did the EPA do in 2007?
Environmental Protection Agency is a 2007 United States Supreme Court ruling that found that carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and can be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ).
Is lead regulated by the EPA?
Lead is a pollutant regulated by many laws administered by EPA , including the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Residential Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X), Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and
Does the EPA regulate co2?
The EPA determined that, according to this decision, there are six greenhouse gases that need to be regulated . These include: carbon dioxide ( CO2 )
Should the Environmental Protection Agency EPA have the authority to regulate co2?
The Supreme Court ruled in a 7-to-2 decision Monday that the Obama administration’s Environmental Protection Agency is free to regulate carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, as long as the source of emissions in question is a traditional polluter, like a factory or a power plant, rather than a school or a shopping mall.
What are the six pollutants monitored by the EPA?
EPA has established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six of the most common air pollutants — carbon monoxide , lead , ground-level ozone , particulate matter , nitrogen dioxide , and sulfur dioxide —known as “criteria” air pollutants (or simply “ criteria pollutants ”).
What is the most visible form of air pollution?
Terms in this set (14) Six air pollutants. harmful to health and environment. Most visible form of air pollution. particulate matter — the smoke , soot, ash– Sulfur Dioxide. combustion of coal– acid rain—- respiratory tract— carbon monoxide. EPCRA. Most common indoor air pollutants. toxic release inventory. Radon.
What are the 6 major air pollutants?
These six pollutants are carbon monoxide , lead, nitrogen oxides , ground-level ozone , particle pollution (often referred to as particulate matter ), and sulfur oxides .